Hillary Clinton has really strong opinions on radical Islam, but it’s not exactly what you think.

Rather than focusing on justice for the victims of radical Islamic terror, Hillary has decided to argue the semantics of calling them “radical Islamists” in the first place.

So typical.

Mediaite reports:

This Week host George Stephanopoulos called out the former U.S. Secretary of State for not using the phrase during a discussion of the San Bernardino shooting and ISIS.

“Isn’t it a mistake not to say it plain? That the violence is being pushed by radical elements in their faith?”

“Well that’s another thing,” said Clinton. “‘Radical elements who use a dangerous and distorted view of Islam to promote their jihadist ambitions.’ I’m fine with that. I say it all the time.”

… “The problem is, that sounds like we are declaring war against a religion. That to me is number one, wrong,” said Clinton. “It doesn’t do justice to the vast numbers of Muslims in our own country and around the world who are peaceful people.”

Meanwhile, radical Islamists continue to kill around the world with no plans to stop until everyone pledges allegiance to ISIS and Allah, and they really couldn’t care less what their agenda “sounds like” to other people.

When are Democrats going to stop caring so much about how they “sound” and start paying more attention to what they can DO to stop terrorist attacks on American soil, and ultimately destroy ISIS and the spread of radical Islamic terror?

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,