Investigation: How the FBI Copied Parts of the Debunked Steele Dossier Directly Into Its Spy Requests
Will this presidential election be the most important in American history?
Investigation by Paul Sperry originally published by RealClearInvestigations and RealClearWire
The FBI relied more extensively on Christopher Steeleās debunked dossier in their Russiagate investigation than has been revealed, inserting key parts from it into their applications for warrants to spy on the 2016 Trump campaign.
Agents did this without telling the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that the precise wording was plucked directly from a political rumor sheet paid for by Hillary Clintonās campaign or providing judges with any independent corroboration of the explosive allegations.
But the notion that mere āsnippetsā of the reporting by paid Clinton subcontractor Christopher Steele showed up in FISA applications, as CNN has described it, no longer holds up to scrutiny.
A close examination of all four of the FISA warrants reveals that the FBI lifted dozens of key phrases from the dossier ā as well as practically some entire sentences ā and pasted them verbatim into their sworn affidavits. It did so repeatedly without citing its sources or using typical hedging language such as āallegedlyā or āpurportedlyā to indicate that the claims were unverified.
As a result, the FBI lent its voice of authority to many of the unsourced ā and now debunked ā accusations in the dossier.
Read the entire report here.
__________
Paul Sperry is an investigative reporter for RealClearInvestigations. He is also a longtime media fellow at Stanfordās Hoover Institution. Sperry was previously the Washington bureau chief for Investorās Business Daily, and his work has appeared in the New York Post, Wall Street Journal, New York Times, and Houston Chronicle, among other major publications.
This article was originally published by RealClearInvestigations and made available via RealClearWire.