Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Jannah Theme License is not validated, Go to the theme options page to validate the license, You need a single license for each domain name.
Corporate WelfareGovernment PoliciesNews

Should the US Enact Bad Policy Because “Other Countries Are Doing It?”

Will this presidential election be the most important in American history?

In his latest piece for the Washington Examiner, columnist Tim Carney debunked the fallacies of the “we should do it because everyone else is doing it” argument, when it comes to the Export-Import bank.

He writes:

The argument that convinces most people to support the Export-Import Bank is the everybody else is doing it argument. This argument is based on faulty reasoning, misrepresentation of the facts, bad economics, and an odd (though slightly veiled) appeal to fairness.

… China subsidizes its exports far more than the U.S. does. This probably helps the subsidized Chinese exporters, but it hurts China’s economy as a whole. Research by Fabrice Defever and Alejandro Riaño, presented at the Royal Economic Society’s 2013 annual conference claims that if China removed its export subsidies China’s national income would rise by 3 percent.

Economist Frédéric Bastiat once wrote: “it makes no more sense to be protectionist because other countries have tariffs than it would to block up our harbors because other countries have rocky coasts.” Similarly, it does not make sense to subsidize exports just because other countries do.

The Export-Import bank is an outdated system of corporate welfare that hurts small businesses. The program’s entire existence is a hat tip to the big businesses that pay big money to get politicians elected in the first place.

Here are the main points Carney makes in his piece, which is definitely worth the read (condensed into bullet points):

– Other countries hurt themselves with export subsidies
– Ex-Im actually partners with (and subsidizes) foreign export subsidizers
– U.S. Ex-Im primarily subsidizes China’s government
– Our Ex-Im inspires other countries to subsidize their exports
– Ex-Im’s recipients also lobby foreign governments to expand their export subsidies
– Foreign Ex-Ims (and their customers) are hoping Congress reauthorizes Ex-Im

Learn more about these points and read the full version of the article at the Washington Examiner here.

Tom Borelli

Dr. Tom Borelli is a Newsmax TV contributor and radio commentator addressing political issues from a conservative grassroots perspective. As a columnist, he has written for The Washington Times and authored articles for Newsmax Magazine, Newsmax Insider and previously was a co-host with his wife Deneen Borelli on the SiriusXM Patriot channel. Dr. Borelli appeared on numerous television programs, including the highly ranked Fox News Channel’s “The O’Reilly Factor,” “Hannity,” “The Kelly File," and "America’s News Headquarters." He has also appeared on Fox Business Network’s “Making Money with Charles Payne” and “After the Bell” as well as TheBlaze TV’s "The Glenn Beck Program" and "Dana!" Prior to working for public policy organizations, Dr. Borelli was a managing partner with the investment advisory firm of Action Fund Management, LLC and a portfolio manager for the Free Enterprise Action Fund (FEAF) where he used shareholder activism to challenge corporations that sought to profit from the growth of government. During his 25 years with the Altria Group, Inc., he built a foundation in public policy and issues management, drawing from diverse experiences ranging from basic research to corporate affairs. Dr. Borelli served as science fellow for the U.S. House of Representatives' Committee on Science, Space, and Technology during the 100th Congress. Dr. Borelli has also published scientific papers on interferon and human leukemia.

Related Articles